Useful links |  Site Map  |  Search  |  Contact us  

 

Home

Strawberry
  • June bearing

  • Day neutral / Everbearing

  • Red flowering

  • Antioxidant

  • Nurseries

Raspberry
  • New selections

Apple
  • Cultivars & selections

  • Apple rootstocks

  • Winter hardiness

  • Apple thinning

  • Cider

  • Nurseries

Other
  • Grape wine

  • Ginseng

  • Useful links

  • References sites

  • Signed agreement

Team
  • Personnel

  • Graduate students

  • Post Doc., Visiting scholar

  • Trainees

  • Summer students

  • Collaborators

  • Partners

Publications
  • Books, Posters, CD's, Softwares

  • Order

  • Publications

  • Access to selected publications, books, softwares

 
Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
Results
References
Partners
Collaborator

 

Effect of selected chemical applications (SevinXLR Plus, Accell) on the quality and yield of McIntosh apples

 

Table 1. Effect of thinning on average fruit number, weight and yield of McIntosh apples.

Treatment

 

Number of fruits / tree (no)
1997                  1998
Fruit weight1
(g)
19971               19982
Yield / tree
(kg)
1997              1998
Accell
SevinXLR Plus
Accell+SevinXLR Plus
Hand-thinned
Control (unthinned)
257a3                   164a
219a                     131a
125b                     139a
119b                     158a
230a                     166a
132a                   136cd
131a                   150ab
144a                   152a
140a                   143bc
131a                   134d
33.9a             42.235a
28.6b             33.568a
18.0c             36.229a
16.7c             38.987a
30.1b             40.736a
1 Fruit weight is an average weight of 50 apples.
2 Fruit weight is an average weight of 180 apples.
3 Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.

Return to Results

Table 2. Effect of thinning on fruit firmness, color, soluble solids content and acidity of McIntosh apples when tested immediately after the 1997 harvest.

Treatment

Pressure, side 11 (kg)

Pressure, side 2 (kg)

Color

(% ± SD)

Soluble solids

(% ± SD)

Acidity

(% ± SD)

Accell

6.65b2

6.65b

65.33 ± 14.84

11.575 ± 0.386 d

0.932 ± 0.120 b

SevinXLR Plus

6.92ab

6.92ab

72.17 ± 13.06

11.725 ± 0.150 cd

0.931 ± 0.061 b

Accell+Sevin

7.27a

7.27a

68.83 ± 19.56

12.200 ± 0.271 b

1.149 ± 0.079 a

Hand-thinned

6.86ab

6.86ab

63.78 ± 15.75

12.700 ± 0.100 a

1.206 ± 0.027 a

Control (unthinned)

6.84ab

6.83ab

64.17 ± 17.85

12.075 ± 0.457 bc

1.037 ± 0.153 ab

1 Means are an average value of tests run on 60 apples (15 apples / replicate, 4 replicates /treatment).
2 Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.

Return to Results

Table 3. Effect of thinning on fruit firmness, color, soluble solids content and acidity of McIntosh apples after a storage of 152 days at 4C (1997 harvest).

Treatment
Pressure, side 11            (kg)
Pressure, side 2 (kg)
Soluble solids
(% ± SD)
Acidity
(% ± SD)
Accell

4.93b2

5.10b

12.350 ± 0.624 b

0.558 ± 0.040 c

SevinXLR Plus

5.06ab

5.28b

12.575 ± 0.386 b

0.581 ± 0.054 bc

Accell+Sevin

5.38a

5.84a

13.125 ± 0.574 a

0.664 ± 0.050 a

Hand-thinned

5.27ab

5.55ab

13.600 ± 0.436 a

0.707 ± 0.017 a

Control (unthinned)

5.11ab

5.42ab

12.475 ± 0.574 b

0.585 ± 0.076 b

1 Means are an average value of tests run on 60 apples (15 apples / replicate, 4 replicates /treatment).
2 Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.

Return to Results

Table 4. Effect of thinning on fruit firmness, color, soluble solids content and acidity of McIntosh apples after a storage of 229 days under controlled atmospheric conditions (1997 harvest).

Treatment
Pressure, side 11 (kg)
Pressure, side 2 (kg)
Soluble solids
(% ± SD)
Acidity
(% ± SD)
Accell

5.95

5.84

11.775 ± 0.531 c3

0.520 ± 0.034 c

SevinXLR Plus

5.93

5.90

12.225 ± 0.395 bc

0.562 ± 0.037 bc

Accell+Sevin

6.12

6.03

13.125 ± 0.486 a

0.712 ± 0.053 a

Hand-thinned

5.88

5.79

13.267 ± 0.321 a

0.710 ± 0.036 a

Control (unthinned)

6.23

6.08

12.375 ± 0.486 b

0.602 ± 0.083 b

1 Means are an average value of tests run on 60 apples (15 apples / replicate, 4 replicates /treatment).
2 Means with no letter(s) are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.
3 Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.

Return to Results

Table 5. Effect of thinning on fruit firmness, color, soluble solids content and acidity of McIntosh apples after a storage of 229 days under controlled atmospheric conditions followed by 7 days at room temperature (1997 harvest).

Treatment
Pressure, side 11 (kg)
Pressure, side 2 (kg)
Soluble solids
(% ± SD)
Acidity
(% ± SD)
Accell

5.432

5.42

12.050 ± 0.311 b3

0.433 ± 0.011 c

SevinXLR Plus

5.46

5.37

12.100 ± 0.424 b

0.471 ± 0.051 c

Accell+Sevin

5.62

5.55

12.975 ± 0.492 a

0.591 ± 0.056 a

Hand-thinned

5.39

5.29

13.025 ± 0.351 a

0.547 ± 0.062 ab

Control (unthinned)

5.60

5.47

12.500 ± 0.600 ab

0.502 ± 0.058 bc

1 Means are an average value of tests run on 60 apples (15 apples / replicate, 4 replicates /treatment).
2 Means with no letter(s) are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.
3 Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.

Return to Results

Table 6. Effect of thinning on fruit firmness, color, soluble solids content and acidity of McIntosh apples when tested immediately after the 1998 harvest.

Treatment
Pressure, side 11 (kg)
Pressure, side 2 (kg)
Color
(% ± SD)
Soluble solids
(% ± SD)
Acidity
(% ± SD)
Accell

6.752

7.35

77.67 ± 11.913

11.150 ± 0.100

0.741± 0.024

SevinXLR Plus

6.68

7.30

80.417 ± 9.755

11.525 ± 0.206

0.794 ± 0.022

Accell+Sevin

6.83

7.44

78.250 ± 8.069

10.397 ± 2.54

1.014 ± 0.414

Hand-thinned

6.70

7.32

80.417 ± 8.197

11.400 ± 0.153

0.756 ± 0.051

Control (unthinned)

6.70

7.16

77.667 ± 10.393

11.450 ± 0.173

0.745 ± 0.046

1 Means are an average value of tests run on 60 apples (15 apples / replicate, 4 replicates /treatment).
2 Means are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.

Return to Results

Table 7. Effect of thinning on fruit firmness, color, soluble solids content and acidity of McIntosh apples after a storage of 181 days under controlled atmospheric conditions (1998 harvest).

Treatment
Pressure, side 11 (kg)
Pressure, side 2 (kg)
Soluble solids
(% ± SD)
Acidity
(% ± SD)
Accell

6.392

6.20

11.000 ± 0.469

0.482 ± 0.036b3

SevinXLR Plus

6.06

6.03

11.600 ± 0.082

0.544 ± 0.034a

Accell+Sevin

6.08

6.00

11.800 ± 0.455

0.519 ± 0.019ab

Hand-thinned

6.18

6.01

11.425 ± 0.263

0.509 ± 0.043ab

Control (unthinned)

6.39

6.19

11.675 ± 0.263

0.496 ± 0.045ab

1 Means are an average value of tests run on 60 apples (15 apples / replicate, 4 replicates /treatment).
2 Means with no letter(s) are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.
3 Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.

Return to Results

Table 8. Effect of thinning on fruit firmness, color, soluble solids content and acidity of McIntosh apples after a storage of 181 days under controlled atmospheric conditions followed by 7 days at room temperature (1998 harvest)

Treatment
Pressure, side 11 (kg)
Pressure, side 2 (kg)
Soluble solids
(% ± SD)
Acidity
(% ± SD)
Accell

5.302

5.29

11.625 ± 0.395

0.404 ± 0.022

SevinXLR Plus

5.39

5.23

11.775 ± 0.263

0.437 ± 0.017

Accell+Sevin

5.28

5.23

11.875 ± 0.320

0.422 ± 0.048

Hand-thinned

5.43

5.27

11.625 ± 0.236

0.425 ± 0.015

Control (unthinned)

5.45

5.39

11.725 ± 0.778

0.403 ± 0.027

1 Means are an average value of tests run on 60 apples (15 apples / replicate, 4 replicates /treatment).
2 Means are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.

Return to Results

Table 9. Number of apples with physiological disorders when stored under controlled atmospheric conditions (CAC) followed by a 7 days storage at room temperature (CAC+7) (1997 harvest)

Treatment
Number of apples1 with
vascular breakdown
Number of apples with light senescence breakdown

After CAC

after CAC + 7

after CAC

After CAC + 7

Accell

4

6

5

1

SevinXLR Plus

2

4

0

2

Accell+Sevin

2

17

0

1

Hand-thinned

12

18

5

5

Control (unthinned)

7

9

4

1

1 Total number of apples with physiological disorders over 60 apples that were tested (15 apples/replicate, 4 replicates/treatment).

Return to Results

Table 10. Results of analytical tests on McIntosh apples from trees treated with chemical thinning agents.

Sample
Mean Pectin1/SD
(g galacturonic acid/L)
Mean Total Sugars 1/SD
(g sucrose/100ml)
Mean Titratable Acidity1/SD
(g malic acid/100ml)
Mean pH1/SD
Accell

0.905/0.110

10.3 / 1.11

0.845 / 0.0578

3.04 / 0.0457

SevinXLR Plus

0.836/0.1572

11.0 / 2.842

0.999 / 0.1492

2.98 / 0.05572

Accell + Sevin

0.813/0.218

10.1 / 1.75

1.08 / 0.108

3.02 / 0.0408

Hand-thinned

0.890/0.197

10.9 / 1.09

1.10 / 0.0838

2.98 / 0.0538

Control (unthinned)

0.955/0.0578

9.84 / 1.69

0.917 / 0.162

3.01 / 0.0896

1Average of 4 replicates
2Average of 3 replicates

Return to Results

Fig 1. The effect of application of Sevin XLR Plus, Accell on the thickness of the epidermal and parenchgymatous layers of apple fruits compared to the hand thinned and control.

       
Hand thinned                                                                        Accell
                                                                          
       
Accell + Sevin                                                                      Control (untreated trees)

Return to Results

 

Useful links |  Site Map  |  Search  |  Contact us
Last updated: 2007-12-04